top of page

Luke’s Gospel and Redaction Criticism: Reordering Tradition for a New Theology




Redaction Criticism in the Gospel of Luke: A Scholarly Exploration

Introduction to Redaction Criticism

Redaction Criticism is a key tool in biblical scholarship used to explore how Gospel writers edited and shaped their sources to convey specific theological messages. In the case of the Gospel of Luke, this form of criticism is essential for understanding how Luke rearranged, modified, and added to the material from his sources—primarily Mark, the hypothetical Q source, and his own unique material (often referred to as L)—to fit his theological goals.

The Gospel of Luke is the first part of a two-volume work, with the second part being the Acts of the Apostles. Scholars believe that Luke, a companion of Paul, wrote this Gospel for a largely Gentile audience, with a strong emphasis on universal salvation, inclusion of the marginalized, and the role of the Holy Spirit. Redaction Criticism helps us identify the editorial decisions Luke made to highlight these themes, making his Gospel distinct from the other Synoptics (Matthew and Mark).

In this exploration, we will unpack the problems and key terms scholars encounter when applying Redaction Criticism to Luke’s Gospel. We will examine Luke’s sources, the theological themes that guided his editorial activity, and provide case studies of how Luke’s redaction is evident in specific passages. Through a detailed analysis, we will see how Luke’s Gospel is not merely a repetition of earlier traditions but a carefully crafted narrative designed to convey his unique theological vision.

1. The Key Problems and Terms in Redaction Criticism

Redaction Criticism brings forward several challenges and key terms when applied to the Gospel of Luke. Scholars have identified specific areas of focus in this Gospel, where Luke’s editorial activity reshapes existing traditions for his theological purposes.

a) The Sources Luke Used

Luke’s Gospel is based on several sources, which he carefully edited. These include:

  • Mark’s Gospel: Luke uses Mark as his primary source for the narrative of Jesus’ ministry but often rearranges or expands on it. For example, the sequence of events in Luke differs significantly from Mark in certain places.

  • Q Source: Q is a hypothetical source containing sayings of Jesus that Luke and Matthew likely used. Luke edits and reworks Q material to emphasize his particular theological themes.

  • L Source: This refers to material unique to Luke’s Gospel, such as certain parables and events. These additions highlight Luke’s particular concerns with social justice, inclusion, and divine mercy.

By understanding Luke’s relationship to his sources, we can better see how his editorial hand reshaped the Gospel narrative.

b) Redactional Themes in Luke

When examining Luke’s Gospel through the lens of Redaction Criticism, several themes emerge that reflect his theological agenda:

  • Universal Salvation: Luke emphasizes that Jesus’ mission is not just for the Jews but for all people, especially Gentiles.

  • Social Justice and Compassion for the Poor: Luke’s Gospel places a strong emphasis on God’s concern for the poor, the oppressed, and the marginalized, themes that are highlighted through his redaction of earlier traditions.

  • Jesus as Prophet: Luke often portrays Jesus as a prophet in the tradition of Elijah and Elisha, who bring God’s word to the people and are often rejected.

  • The Role of the Holy Spirit: The Holy Spirit is central in Luke’s Gospel, guiding Jesus from his conception to his ministry and continuing to guide the Church in Acts. Luke edits his material to emphasize the Spirit’s role in salvation history.

c) Major Redactional Changes

In his redactional work, Luke engages in several editorial practices, including:

  • Reordering of Events: Luke sometimes changes the sequence of events from Mark’s Gospel to fit his narrative structure. A key example is Luke moving the story of Jesus’ rejection at Nazareth to the beginning of his ministry (Luke 4:16-30), whereas in Mark 6:1-6, it occurs much later.

  • Omission and Addition: Luke occasionally omits material from his sources that doesn’t fit his theological emphasis and adds his own unique material. For example, Luke omits the story of Jesus cursing the fig tree (Mark 11:12-14, 20-21), perhaps because it doesn’t align with his portrayal of Jesus as compassionate and merciful.

  • Theological Emphasis: Luke uses editorial changes to emphasize particular theological points, such as God’s mercy or Jesus’ prophetic role.

In this section, we will explore each of these problems and terms in greater detail, using examples from the text and scholarly analysis.

2. Luke’s Use of Sources

Scholars agree that Luke used Mark’s Gospel as a source, as well as the Q source, which is a collection of sayings of Jesus. However, Luke’s Gospel differs significantly in content and structure, reflecting his unique theological aims.

a) The Use of Mark

Luke’s use of Mark’s Gospel is particularly interesting in how he edits and rearranges Mark’s material. For example:

  • The Rejection at Nazareth (Luke 4:16-30 vs. Mark 6:1-6): One of the most striking differences between Luke and Mark is where Luke places the rejection of Jesus at Nazareth. In Mark, this event happens in the middle of Jesus’ ministry, but Luke moves it to the very beginning. This change serves several purposes for Luke:

    • It establishes Jesus’ prophetic role early in the narrative. By having Jesus read from the scroll of Isaiah and proclaim that the prophecy has been fulfilled, Luke sets the tone for the rest of the Gospel.

    • It foreshadows the rejection Jesus will face throughout his ministry, culminating in his crucifixion in Jerusalem.

    • Luke’s editorial choice here also places emphasis on Jesus’ message of salvation for all people, as Jesus points out that in the days of Elijah and Elisha, God sent prophets to Gentiles, not Israelites.

  • Miracles and Healings: Luke often expands on miracle stories from Mark or adds unique material that fits his focus on compassion and social justice. For example, Luke adds the raising of the widow’s son at Nain (Luke 7:11-17), a story not found in Mark, which emphasizes Jesus’ compassion for the marginalized.

b) The Use of Q (Sayings Source)

The Q source is a hypothetical document scholars believe contained a collection of Jesus’ sayings, used by both Matthew and Luke. Luke’s use of Q material often reflects his unique theological concerns:

  • The Sermon on the Plain (Luke 6:17-49): While Matthew’s Gospel includes the Sermon on the Mount, Luke presents a shorter version, known as the Sermon on the Plain. There are several significant differences:

    • Luke’s Beatitudes focus on the literal poor, not the “poor in spirit” as in Matthew (Matthew 5:3 vs. Luke 6:20). This reflects Luke’s concern with economic justice.

    • Luke includes a set of woes following the blessings, warning the rich, the full, and those who are laughing now that their fortunes will be reversed (Luke 6:24-26). This emphasis on the reversal of fortunes is a key theme in Luke’s Gospel.

  • The Parable of the Lost Sheep: While this parable appears in both Matthew (Matthew 18:12-14) and Luke (Luke 15:3-7), Luke places it in the context of a series of parables about God’s mercy and forgiveness. In Luke’s Gospel, the parable is part of Jesus’ defense of eating with sinners and tax collectors, reinforcing Luke’s focus on God’s compassion for the marginalized.

c) Luke’s Unique Material (L Source)

Luke also incorporates a significant amount of material that is unique to his Gospel, referred to as the L Source. This material often reflects Luke’s particular theological concerns.

  • The Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37): This parable, which is only found in Luke, reflects his concern with mercy and compassion for outsiders. By making a Samaritan the hero of the story, Luke challenges the prejudices of his audience and highlights the inclusivity of God’s kingdom.

  • The Prodigal Son (Luke 15:11-32): Another story unique to Luke, the parable of the Prodigal Son emphasizes God’s forgiveness and the boundless nature of divine mercy. The father’s joy at the return of his wayward son mirrors God’s joy over the repentance of sinners.


Through his use of these sources, Luke reshapes earlier traditions to emphasize his theological themes, particularly God’s mercy, social justice, and the inclusion of Gentiles and outsiders. 3. Luke’s Theological and Literary Interests

Luke’s editorial decisions are not arbitrary; they are guided by clear theological and literary interests. These interests shape how Luke presents the life and ministry of Jesus, and they distinguish his Gospel from Matthew, Mark, and John.

a) Universal Salvation

Luke emphasizes that Jesus’ mission is for all people, not just the Jews. This theme is evident from the very beginning of his Gospel:

  • In Luke 2:29-32, Simeon, holding the infant Jesus, declares that he will be “a light for revelation to the Gentiles and the glory of your people Israel.” This sets the tone for the rest of Luke’s Gospel, where Gentiles, Samaritans, and other outsiders frequently play significant roles.

  • In Acts, the sequel to Luke’s Gospel, this theme continues as the apostles take the message of Jesus to the Gentiles, culminating in Paul’s mission to the ends of the earth.

b) Social Justice and Compassion for the Marginalized

Luke’s Gospel is often described as the “Gospel of the Poor” because of its focus on the marginalized, including the poor, women, and sinners. Luke’s redaction of the Beatitudes in the Sermon on the Plain emphasizes this theme:

  • Luke 6:20: “Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God.”

  • Luke 6:24-26: Luke follows the Beatitudes with a series of woes directed at the rich, the full, and those who are laughing now. These verses reflect Luke’s emphasis on the reversal of fortunes, a theme that runs throughout his Gospel (e.g., Luke 1:52-53, where Mary praises God for bringing down the mighty and exalting the humble).

c) Jesus as Prophet

Luke frequently portrays Jesus as a prophet, drawing parallels between Jesus and the Old Testament prophets, particularly Elijah and Elisha. This theme is established early in the Gospel, when Jesus reads from the book of Isaiah and declares:

  • Luke 4:18-19: “The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”

By emphasizing Jesus’ prophetic role, Luke connects Jesus to the prophetic tradition of Israel, highlighting his mission to the poor, the oppressed, and the marginalized.

d) The Role of the Holy Spirit

Luke’s Gospel, along with Acts, places special emphasis on the Holy Spirit. The Spirit is present from the very beginning of Jesus’ life and continues to guide the early Church in Acts.

  • Luke 1:35: The Holy Spirit is involved in Jesus’ conception, as the angel Gabriel tells Mary, “The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you.”

  • Luke 3:22: At Jesus’ baptism, the Holy Spirit descends on him in the form of a dove, confirming his divine mission.

  • Luke 4:1: Jesus is described as being “full of the Holy Spirit” and is led by the Spirit into the wilderness for his temptation.

In both Luke’s Gospel and Acts, the Spirit empowers believers, guides them in their mission, and ensures the spread of the Gospel to all nations.

4. Case Studies: Redaction in Key Passages

a) The Rejection at Nazareth (Luke 4:16-30)

Luke’s editorial decision to move the story of Jesus’ rejection at Nazareth to the beginning of his ministry is a prime example of his redactional work. In Mark 6:1-6, the rejection at Nazareth occurs later in Jesus’ ministry, but Luke places it at the beginning to emphasize certain theological themes:

  • Jesus as Prophet: By positioning this story early, Luke presents Jesus as a prophet who, like the prophets of old, is rejected by his own people.

  • Salvation for Outsiders: In Luke 4:25-27, Jesus mentions Elijah and Elisha, two prophets who were sent to minister to Gentiles. This foreshadows the inclusion of Gentiles in Jesus’ ministry and reinforces the theme of universal salvation.

b) The Sermon on the Plain (Luke 6:17-49)

Luke’s version of the Sermon on the Mount, known as the Sermon on the Plain, differs significantly from Matthew’s account. These differences reflect Luke’s theological priorities:

  • Focus on the Literal Poor: Luke’s Beatitudes focus on the literal poor and hungry, rather than the spiritualized versions in Matthew (e.g., “Blessed are the poor in spirit” in Matthew 5:3 vs. “Blessed are you who are poor” in Luke 6:20).

  • Woes to the Rich: Luke includes a set of woes that are not found in Matthew’s Gospel, warning the rich, the full, and those who laugh now that they will face future judgment (Luke 6:24-26). This reflects Luke’s concern with social justice and the reversal of fortunes.

c) The Passion Narrative

Luke’s redaction of the Passion Narrative also reveals his theological concerns. One notable example is Luke 23:34, where Jesus prays from the cross: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” This prayer, unique to Luke’s Gospel, reflects his emphasis on forgiveness and divine mercy, even in the face of suffering and death.

Conclusion

Through Redaction Criticism, scholars have uncovered how Luke shaped his sources—Mark, Q, and his own unique material (L)—to fit his theological agenda. Whether he is emphasizing the universal scope of Jesus’ mission, compassion for the poor and marginalized, or the role of the Holy Spirit, Luke’s Gospel reflects the concerns of the early Christian community and its outreach to both Jews and Gentiles.

Luke’s editorial choices, such as rearranging the narrative order or adding unique material, help to create a cohesive theological vision that is distinct from the other Gospels. His portrayal of Jesus as a prophet, his emphasis on social justice, and his focus on the Holy Spirit make Luke’s Gospel a powerful and inclusive account of Jesus’ life and ministry.

By studying Luke’s redactional activity, we gain insight into how the Gospel writers used their sources not just to record history, but to convey theological truths to their communities. Luke’s Gospel continues to speak to readers today, offering a message of hope, mercy, and salvation for all people.

留言


Inviting Theology

Our Logo shows unity as a full circle but we approuch theology with respect and with a critical eye

Join our mailing list

bottom of page